Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding associated with oral anticoagulants.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has shown non-inferiority compared to oral anticoagulation (OAC) in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF)-related stroke. The objective of this study was to assess whether LAAC reduces the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and/or chronic anaemia associated with OAC, as well as the consumption of healthcare resources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective, single-center study from 2016 to 2022, LAAC was performed. Clinical, analytical and healthcare resource consumption data were collected (endoscopies, blood transfusions, hospital admissions) prior and 6 months after LAAC. RESULTS: 43 patients were included, with an average age of 77.6 years. LAAC indication was upper, low and obscure GIB in 7 (16%), 8 (19%) and 28 patients (65%) respectively. GIB source was intestinal angiodysplasias in 27 patients (63%), occult origin in 12 (28%), and others (antral vascular ectasia, portal hypertension gastropathy, etc.) in 4 patients (9%). The mean number of packed red blood cells per patient before LAAC was (mean ± SD) 7.29 ± 5 vs 0.42 ± 1.3 (p < 0.001); endoscopic procedures were 4.34 ± 2.85 vs 0.27 ± 0.76 (p < 0.001); and hospitalizations 2.67 ± 2.14 vs 0.03 ± 0.17 (p < 0.001), with a hospital stay of 21.5 ± 17.3 vs 0.09 ± 0.5 days (p < 0.001) at 6 months post-intervention. Haemoglobin value increased from 8.1 ± 1.2g/dl to 12.4 ± 2.2g/dl (p < 0.001) at 6 months. No thromboembolic events were registered during a median follow-up of 16.6 months (range 6-65). CONCLUSIONS: LAAC could be a safe and effective alternative to OAC in patients with non-valvular AF presenting significant, recurrent or potentially unresolvable GIB. This intervention also leads to important savings in the consumption of healthcare resources.

Bismuth quadruple three-in-one single capsule three times a day increases effectiveness compared with the usual four times a day schedule: results from the European Registry on Helicobacter pylori Management (Hp-EuReg).

BACKGROUND: The recommended schedule for single capsule bismuth quadruple therapy (scBQT, Pylera) includes a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) two times a day and three scBQT capsules four times a day. Four times a day treatments are inconvenient and reduce adherence. In contrast, adherence improves with three times a day schedules. In clinical practice, many gastroenterologists use four capsule scBQT three times a day. However, the effectiveness and safety of this latter approach remain uncertain. AIM: To assess the effectiveness and safety of scBQT administered three times a day in the patients included in the European Registry on Helicobacter pylori Management (Hp-EuReg). METHODS: All Spanish adult patients registered in the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database from June 2013 to March 2021 receiving 10-day scBQT were analysed. Modified intention-to-treat effectiveness, adherence and the safety of scBQT given three times a day were calculated and compared with the four times a day schedule. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent factors predicting cure of the infection. RESULTS: Of the 3712 cases, 2516 (68%) were four times a day and 1196 (32%) three times a day. Mean age was 51 years, 63% were women and 15% had a peptic ulcer. The three times a day schedule showed significantly better overall cure rates than four times a day (1047/1112, 94%; 95% CI 92.7 to 95.6 vs 2207/2423, 91%; 95% CI 89.9 to 92.2, respectively, p=0.002). Adherence and safety data were similar for both regimens. In the multivariate analysis, three times a day dosage, first-line therapy, use of standard or high-dose PPIs and adherence over 90% were significantly associated with cure of the infection. CONCLUSIONS: ScBQT prescribed three times a day was more effective than the traditional four times a day schedule. No differences were observed in treatment adherence or safety.

Traducción al español y validación de un cuestionario breve de medida del control de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal desde la perspectiva del paciente: IBD-Control, EII-Control / Translation into Spanish and validation of a short questionnaire to measure the control of inflammatory bowel disease from the patient's perspective: IBD-Control, EII-Control

Objetivo: La medida de los resultados percibidos por el paciente en la asistencia de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) adquiere cada vez más importancia. Existe una herramienta sencilla y validada en inglés para este fin: el «IBD-Control». Nuestro objetivo es traducirlo al español, adaptarlo y validarlo.Pacientes y métodos: Se tradujo el IBD-Control, generando el instrumento en español «EII-Control», y se validó prospectivamente. Los pacientes cumplimentaban el EII-Control y otros cuestionarios que servían de comparadores de referencia. El gastroenterólogo realizaba una valoración global de la enfermedad, calculaba índices de actividad y registraba el tratamiento. Un subgrupo de pacientes repitió toda la valoración en una segunda visita. Se analizó también la utilidad de escalas resumidas del EII-Control (el EII-Control-8 y el EII-Control-EVA). Resultados: Se incluyeron 249 pacientes con EII (101 repitieron la segunda visita). Estándares psicométricos del test: consistencia interna: α de Cronbach para EII-Control 0,83 con fuerte correlación entre EII-Control-8 y EII-Control-EVA (r=0,5); reproducibilidad: correlación intraclase 0,70 para EII-Control; validez de constructo: correlaciones de moderadas a fuertes entre EII-Control, EII-Control-8 y EII-Control-EVA frente a comparadores; validez discriminante: p <0,001; sensibilidad al cambio: misma respuesta que índice de calidad de vida. Sensibilidad y especificidad en el punto de corte 14 de 0,696 y 0,903, respectivamente, para determinar el estado quiescente. Conclusiones: El EII-Control es un instrumento válido para medir el control de la EII desde la perspectiva del paciente en nuestro medio y cultura. Su simplicidad lo convierte en una herramienta útil para apoyar la asistencia.(AU)

Objective: Measurement of patient-perceived outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care is becoming increasingly important. A simple and validated tool exists in English for this purpose, the “IBD-Control”. Our aim is to translate it into Spanish, adapt and validate it. Patients and methods: The IBD-Control was translated into the Spanish instrument “EII-Control” and prospectively validated. Patients completed the EII-Control and other questionnaires that served as baseline comparators. The gastroenterologist performed a global assessment of the disease, calculated activity indices and recorded treatment. A subgroup of patients repeated the entire assessment at a second visit. The usefulness of IBD-Control summary scales (IBD-Control-8 and IBD-Control-VAS) was also analysed. Results: A total of 249 IBD patients were included (101 repeated the second visit). Psychometric standards of the test: internal consistency: Cronbach's α for EII-Control 0.83 with strong correlation between EII-Control-8 and EII-Control-EVA (r=0.5); reproducibility: intra-class correlation 0.70 for EII-Control; construct validity: moderate to strong correlations between IBD-Control, IBD-Control-8 and IBD-Control-VAS versus comparators; discriminant validity: P<.001; sensitivity to change: same response as quality of life index. Sensitivity and specificity at cut-off point 14 of 0.696 and 0.903, respectively, to determine quiescent status. Conclusions: The IBD-Control is a valid instrument to measure IBD-Control from the patient's perspective in our environment and culture. Its simplicity makes it a useful tool to support care.(AU)

Endoscopic suspect of subacute occlusive mesenteric ischemia.

A 74-year-old patient presented to our emergency department with melena for 24 hours, associated with postprandial abdominal pain, predominantly in the epigastrium, for one month. Urgent gastroscopy showed a pale mucosa with loss of vascular pattern in the gastric antrum, as well as several superficial ulcers, Forrest III, at that level and in the duodenal bulb highly suggestive of ischaemia. An abdominal computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed a filiform celiac trunk, with calcified atherosclerotic plaques in the ostium, superior mesenteric artery and both renal arteries, with absence of enhancement in a large part of the intestinal wall, suggestive of ischaemia. An exploratory laparoscopy confirmed patchy ischaemia of the small intestine, as well as of the cecum, ascending colon, and portion of the transversus. Atherosclerosis is the most common cause of occlusive chronic mesenteric ischaemia. The 'classic triad' consisting of postprandial pain, weight loss and abdominal bruit, is found in only a minority of patients, with a significant percentage of paucisymptomatic patients due to abundant colateral circulation, making diagnosis difficult. The endoscopic finding of edema, erythema or signs of mucosal atrophy, as well as gastric or duodenal ulcers, not justified by other causes can guide us in the diagnosis. However, more distal sections of the digestive tract which are not accessible with the conventional endoscope can often be affected, and the absence of these findings, does not exclude the diagnosis. Abdominal CTA is the gold-standard imaging test. Early diagnosis of mesenteric ischaemia is a challenge in clinical practice. Recognizing its endoscopic signs can facilitate its early diagnosis and treatment.

Uso de prótesis esofágicas cubiertas de doble malla en fístulas esofágicas postquirúrgicas y perforaciones esofágicas: experiencia en nuestro centro / Use of double-layered covered esophageal stents in post-surgical esophageal leaks and esophageal perforation: Our experience

Introducción: El uso de prótesis esofágicas para el manejo endoscópico de fístulas y perforaciones se ha convertido en un procedimiento habitual. Una de sus limitaciones es su alta tasa de migración. Para resolver esta situación, se ha propuesto el uso de prótesis cubiertas de doble malla.Objetivos: Analizar nuestra experiencia práctica en el empleo de prótesis esofágicas cubiertas de doble malla (PECDM) (modelo Niti S™ DOUBLE™ Esophageal Metal Stent) en pacientes con fístula o perforación esofágica.Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo y unicéntrico, donde se incluyen pacientes con diagnóstico de fístula o perforación esofágica, desde noviembre 2010 hasta octubre 2018. Como objetivo primario, se evaluará su eficacia en términos de éxito técnico. Como objetivo secundario, se analizará su perfil de seguridad.Resultados: Se incluyeron inicialmente un total de 31 pacientes, siendo 8 de ellos excluidos por fallecimiento por causas ajenas a la técnica. Se detectó un éxito técnico del 100%, con un éxito primario del 75% tras la recolocación de la prótesis. Entre sus complicaciones, la migración ocurrió en un 21,7% de los pacientes (n=5), resolviéndose vía endoscópica en el 100% de los casos.Conclusiones: Según nuestros hallazgos, las PECDM suponen una alternativa en el tratamiento de fístulas y perforaciones esofágicas, con una alta tasa de éxito en la resolución de fístulas y baja de complicaciones, en contraste con lo expuesto en las series publicadas. En todos los casos, la migración de la prótesis se resolvió mediante recolocación endoscópica, sin requerir nueva prótesis ni cirugía.(AU)

Introduction: The use of esophageal stents for the endoscopic management of esophageal leaks and perforations has become a usual procedure. One of its limitations is its high migration rate. To solve this incovenience, the double-layered covered esophageal stents have become an option.Objectives: To analyse our daily practice according to the usage of double-layered covered esophageal metal stents (DLCEMS) (Niti S™ DOUBLE™ Esophageal Metal Stent Model) among patients diagnosed of esophageal leak or perforation.Methods: Retrospective, descriptive and unicentric study, with inclusion of patients diagnosed of esophageal leak or perforation, from November 2010 until October 2018. The main aim is to evaluate the efficacy of DLCEMS, in terms of primary success and technical success. The secondary aim is to evaluate their (the DLCEMS) safety profile.Results: Thirty-one patients were firstly included. Among those, 8 were excluded due to mortality not related to the procedure. Following stent placement, technical success was reached in 100% of the cases, and primary success, in 75% (n=17). Among the complications, stent migration was present in 21.7% of the patients (n=5), in whom the incident was solved by endoscopic means.Conclusions: According to our findings, DLCEMS represent an alternative for esophageal leak and perforation management, with a high success rate in leak and perforation resolutions and low complication rate, in contrast to the published data. The whole number of migrations were corrected by endoscopic replacement, without the need of a new stent or surgery.(AU)

Translation into Spanish and validation of a short questionnaire to measure the control of inflammatory bowel disease from the patient's perspective: IBD-Control, EII-Control. / Traducción al español y validación de un cuestionario breve de medida del control de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal desde la perspectiva del paciente: IBD-Control, EII-Control.

OBJECTIVE: Measurement of patient-perceived outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care is becoming increasingly important. A simple and validated tool exists in English for this purpose, the "IBD-Control". Our aim is to translate it into Spanish, adapt and validate it. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The IBD-Control was translated into the Spanish instrument "EII-Control" and prospectively validated. Patients completed the EII-Control and other questionnaires that served as baseline comparators. The gastroenterologist performed a global assessment of the disease, calculated activity indices and recorded treatment. A subgroup of patients repeated the entire assessment at a second visit. The usefulness of IBD-Control summary scales (IBD-Control-8 and IBD-Control-VAS) was also analysed. RESULTS: A total of 249 IBD patients were included (101 repeated the second visit). Psychometric standards of the test: internal consistency: Cronbach's α for EII-Control 0.83 with strong correlation between EII-Control-8 and EII-Control-EVA (r=0.5); reproducibility: intra-class correlation 0.70 for EII-Control; construct validity: moderate to strong correlations between IBD-Control, IBD-Control-8 and IBD-Control-VAS versus comparators; discriminant validity: P<.001; sensitivity to change: same response as quality of life index. Sensitivity and specificity at cut-off point 14 of 0.696 and 0.903, respectively, to determine quiescent status. CONCLUSIONS: The IBD-Control is a valid instrument to measure IBD-Control from the patient's perspective in our environment and culture. Its simplicity makes it a useful tool to support care.

Use of double-layered covered esophageal stents in post-surgical esophageal leaks and esophageal perforation: Our experience. / Uso de prótesis esofágicas cubiertas de doble malla en fístulas esofágicas postquirúrgicas y perforaciones esofágicas: experiencia en nuestro centro.

INTRODUCTION: The use of esophageal stents for the endoscopic management of esophageal leaks and perforations has become a usual procedure. One of its limitations is its high migration rate. To solve this incovenience, the double-layered covered esophageal stents have become an option. OBJECTIVES: To analyse our daily practice according to the usage of double-layered covered esophageal metal stents (DLCEMS) (Niti S™ DOUBLE™ Esophageal Metal Stent Model) among patients diagnosed of esophageal leak or perforation. METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive and unicentric study, with inclusion of patients diagnosed of esophageal leak or perforation, from November 2010 until October 2018. The main aim is to evaluate the efficacy of DLCEMS, in terms of primary success and technical success. The secondary aim is to evaluate their (the DLCEMS) safety profile. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were firstly included. Among those, 8 were excluded due to mortality not related to the procedure. Following stent placement, technical success was reached in 100% of the cases, and primary success, in 75% (n=17). Among the complications, stent migration was present in 21.7% of the patients (n=5), in whom the incident was solved by endoscopic means. CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, DLCEMS represent an alternative for esophageal leak and perforation management, with a high success rate in leak and perforation resolutions and low complication rate, in contrast to the published data. The whole number of migrations were corrected by endoscopic replacement, without the need of a new stent or surgery.

The Validity of the Invasive Tests for Helicobacter Pylori Diagnosis is Unequally Affected by the Consumption of Antibiotics or Pump Inhibitors. Test Performance under Real-World Conditions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients undergoing upper endoscopy have often used proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and/or antibiotics (ABx) recently. Both drugs have been associated with a poorer yield of the Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) diagnostic tests. The aim was to assess the accuracy of the polymerase chain reaction test (qPCR), histological exam (HE) and ultra-fast urease test (UFUT) for H. pylori detection in patients that recently used PPI or ABx. METHODS: Prospective study recruiting 206 patients who underwent upper endoscopy and gastric biopsies. Demographics and use of PPI/ABx were obtained. Sensibility (Sn), specificity (Sp), predictive value (PV), likelihood ratio (LR) and PABAK concordance index, were calculated, considering as the gold standard the positivity of 2 out of 3 analyzed tests. A global analysis and another one based on the PPI/ABx intake were performed. RESULTS: 48.5% of patients used PPI and 12.8% ABx within the 2 and 4 weeks prior to endoscopy, respectively. The UFUT was positive in 13.1% of patients, HE in 34% and qPCR in 35.9%. UFUT achieved lower Sn (37%) than HE (98%) and qPCR (98%) (p<0.001) overall. ABx were associated with lower Sn in HE (p=0.04) and lower Sp in qPCR (p=0.03). PPI did not associate with a significant drop in Sn and Sp. The concordance between HE and qPCR was 0.83 (95%CI: 0.73-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Under real world conditions, the accuracy and concordance of HE and qPCR to diagnose H. pylori were excellent, but UFUT achieved unsatisfactory outcomes. The intake of ABx was associated with the worse performance, fundamentally for HE. The PPI did not reduce the tests' yield significantly.

Efectos adversos inmunomediados gastrointestinales y hepáticos inducidos por los inhibidores del punto de control inmunitario: estudio descriptivo observacional / Gastrointestinal and liver immune-related adverse effects induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: A descriptive observational study

Introducción: Los inhibidores del punto de control inmunitario (immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICI]) son fármacos eficaces en el tratamiento de diversas neoplasias. Sin embargo, se han relacionado con eventos adversos inmunomediados (EAI) gastrointestinales y hepáticos que pueden desencadenar su interrupción temporal o definitiva. Objetivo: Evaluar, en condiciones de práctica real, la eficacia y la toxicidad gastrointestinal y hepática de los ICI en tratamientos oncológicos. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo con inclusión de pacientes con diagnóstico de neoplasia avanzada que habían recibido al menos una dosis de ICI entre mayo de 2015 y septiembre de 2018. Resultados: Se incluyeron 132 pacientes con neoplasia de pulmón no microcítico (65,15%, n=86), melanoma (22,7%, n=30), carcinoma renal (9,09%, n=12) y otros tumores (3%, n=4). Los fármacos empleados fueron nivolumab (n=82), pembrolizumab (n=28), atezolizumab (n=13), durvalumab (n=2), ipilimumab (n=1) y la combinación anti-CTLA-4/PD-1 (n=6). El 38,6% (n=51) desarrollaron EAI, de tipo gastrointestinal en el 12,9% (n=17). De ellos, el 47% (n=8) requirieron esteroides, y un paciente precisó cirugía por perforación intestinal. En el 3,03% (n=4) se objetivaron EAI hepáticos gradoI: el 50% (n=2) requirieron corticoterapia y en un paciente fue preciso interrumpir el tratamiento. Entre los pacientes con tratamiento combinado, el 66,6% (n=4) presentaron EAI gastrointestinales. La incidencia de EAI no se relacionó con la edad, ni con el sexo, ni con la respuesta al fármaco empleado. Conclusiones: Los EAI gastrointestinales figuran entre los más frecuentemente observados en pacientes en tratamiento con ICI. El manejo multidisciplinar y un mayor conocimiento de dichos eventos podrían ayudarnos a reducir su morbilidad, así como las interrupciones del tratamiento.(AU)

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective agents against several malignancies. However, they are associated with gastrointestinal and liver immune-related adverse events (GI-IrAEs and LI-IrAEs), which can lead to their temporary or permanent discontinuation. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and gastrointestinal and liver toxicity of ICIs in oncological treatments in actual clinical practice. Material and methods: Patients with advanced cancer who received at least 1ICI dose between May 2015 and September 2018 were retrospectively assessed. Results: 132 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (65.15%, n=86); melanoma (22.7%, n=30); renal carcinoma (9.09%, n=12); and other tumours (3%, n=4) were included. The treatments administered were nivolumab (n=82), pembrolizumab (n=28), atezolizumab (n=13), durvalumab (n=2), ipilimumab (n=1) and the antiCTLA-4/PD-1 combination (n=6). In total, 51 patients (38.6%) developed IrAEs, 17 (12.9%) of which experienced GI-IrAEs. Of these, 8 (47%) needed steroids and 1patient required surgery due to intestinal perforation. Grade I Li-IrAEs were observed in 4 patients (3.03%): 2 (50%) required corticosteroids and 1 patient had to discontinue treatment. Four patients (66.6%) who received combination therapy experienced GI-IrAEs. IrAE incidence were not associated with age, gender or drug response. Conclusions: GI-IrAEs are one of the most common adverse events in patients receiving ICIs. A multidisciplinary approach and a greater understanding of these events could help to reduce morbidity and therapy discontinuation.(AU)

Colostomía endoscópica percutánea como tratamiento de un vólvulo de sigma recidivante en paciente casi centenario / No disponible

No disponible

Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy to treat recurrent sigmoid volvulus in an almost centenary patient.

We report the case of a 96-year-old institutionalized male, with severe dementia, who was admitted to our hospital with sigmoid volvulus. After successful decompression, the patient developed recurrent sigmoid volvulus twice within 76 hours, which required endoscopic repositioning. However, after a new recurrence and rejecting surgery, we chose percutaneous endoscopic colostomy, using the standard gastrostomy technique, in order to fix the mobile intestine to the abdominal wall to prevent torsion. Although observational studies with more cases and longer follow-up are needed, percutaneous endoscopic colostomy could be a safe and effective alternative in patients in whom conventional surgery is considered unsafe or inappropriate.

Gastrointestinal and liver immune-related adverse effects induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: A descriptive observational study. / Efectos adversos inmunomediados gastrointestinales y hepáticos inducidos por los inhibidores del punto de control inmunitario: estudio descriptivo observacional.

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective agents against several malignancies. However, they are associated with gastrointestinal and liver immune-related adverse events (GI-IrAEs and LI-IrAEs), which can lead to their temporary or permanent discontinuation. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and gastrointestinal and liver toxicity of ICIs in oncological treatments in actual clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with advanced cancer who received at least 1ICI dose between May 2015 and September 2018 were retrospectively assessed. RESULTS: 132 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (65.15%, n=86); melanoma (22.7%, n=30); renal carcinoma (9.09%, n=12); and other tumours (3%, n=4) were included. The treatments administered were nivolumab (n=82), pembrolizumab (n=28), atezolizumab (n=13), durvalumab (n=2), ipilimumab (n=1) and the antiCTLA-4/PD-1 combination (n=6). In total, 51 patients (38.6%) developed IrAEs, 17 (12.9%) of which experienced GI-IrAEs. Of these, 8 (47%) needed steroids and 1patient required surgery due to intestinal perforation. Grade I Li-IrAEs were observed in 4 patients (3.03%): 2 (50%) required corticosteroids and 1 patient had to discontinue treatment. Four patients (66.6%) who received combination therapy experienced GI-IrAEs. IrAE incidence were not associated with age, gender or drug response. CONCLUSIONS: GI-IrAEs are one of the most common adverse events in patients receiving ICIs. A multidisciplinary approach and a greater understanding of these events could help to reduce morbidity and therapy discontinuation.

Involvement of the digestive system in covid-19. A review. / Afectación del aparato digestivo en la covid-19. Una revisión sobre el tema.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is leading to high mortality and a global health crisis. The primary involvement is respiratory; however, the virus can also affect other organs, such as the gastrointestinal tract and liver. The most common symptoms are anorexia and diarrhea. In about half of the cases, viral RNA could be detected in the stool, which is another line of transmission and diagnosis. covid19 has a worse prognosis in patients with comorbidities, although there is not enough evidence in case of previous digestive diseases. Digestive endoscopies may give rise to aerosols, which make them techniques with a high risk of infection. Experts and scientific organizations worldwide have developed guidelines for preventive measures. The available evidence on gastrointestinal and hepatic involvement, the impact on patients with previous digestive diseases and operating guidelines for Endoscopy Units during the pandemic are reviewed.

Utilidad clínica de la determinación de niveles de CT-P13, biosimilar de infliximab, en el control de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal / Clinical value of CT-P13 trough levels, an infliximab biosimilar, in the management of inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCCIÓN: CT-P13 es un fármaco biosimilar de infliximab (IFX), efectivo en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII). La medición de niveles de IFX y anticuerpos anti-IFX forma parte del tratamiento integral de dicha enfermedad. OBJETIVO: Comparar la respuesta clínica en función de un abordaje estrictamente clínico (CLN) o proactivo (PRO) basado en la medición de niveles en la semana 14, en la práctica clínica. MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo en pacientes que inician CT-P13 por EII. En el grupo PRO se midieron sistemáticamente los niveles de IFX y de anticuerpos postinducción (semana 14) y se intensificaron aquellos con niveles infraterapéuticos (<3μg/ml), independientemente de la respuesta clínica. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 77 pacientes (23 colitis ulcerosa y 54 enfermedad de Crohn). Ambos grupos, PRO (n=41) y CLN (n=36) presentaron una eficacia inicial y a largo plazo sin diferencias significativas. En la semana 14 hubo un 61% de remisión clínica (RC) (58,5% PRO, 63,9% CLN) y un 80,5% de al menos respuesta parcial (RP) (80,5% PRO, 80,6% CLN). En la semana 54 hubo un 68,8% de RC (61% PRO, 77,8% CLN) y un 76,6% de al menos RP (73,2% PRO, 80,6% CLN). De los pacientes en RC en la semana 14 (24 PRO, 23 CLN), 13 del grupo PRO fueron intensificados por niveles infraterapéuticos. En este subgrupo no se observaron diferencias significativas en la pérdida de respuesta secundaria (PRO 0%, CLN 8,7%). CONCLUSIÓN: Un manejo proactivo no mejoró las tasas de respuesta ni la remisión en el primer año. La intensificación de pacientes en RC y niveles infraterapéuticos postinducción no parece prevenir de forma significativa la pérdida de respuesta secundaria en el primer año

INTRODUCTION: CT-P13 is a biosimilar drug of infliximab (IFX), effective in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The monitoring of levels of IFX and anti-IFX antibodies is now considered part of the integral management. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical response according to a strictly clinical (CLN) or proactive (PRO) approach based on the monitoring of levels in week 14, in clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in IBD patients starting CT-P13. In the PRO group, levels of IFX and post-induction antibodies were systematically measured (week 14) and those with infraterapeutic levels (<3μg/ml) were intensified, irrespective of the clinical response. RESULTS: We included 77 patients (23 ulcerative colitis and 54 Crohn's disease). Both PRO (n=41) and CLN (n=36) groups showed initial and long-term efficacy without significant differences. At week 14, 61% clinical remission (CR) (58.5% PRO, 63.9% CLN) and 80.5% at least partial response (PR) (80.5% PRO, 80.6% CLN). In week 54, 68.8% CR (61% PRO, 77.8% CLN) and 76.6% at least PR (73.2% PRO, 80.6% CLN). Of the patients in CR in week 14 (24 PRO, 23 CLN), 13 of the PRO group were intensified due to infra-therapeutic levels. In this subgroup no significant differences were observed in secondary loss of response (PRO 0%, CLN 8.7%). CONCLUSION: Proactive management does not improve response or remission rates in the first year. The intensification of clinical remission patients with post-induction infratherapeutic levels does not seem to significantly prevent secondary loss of response in the first year

Clinical value of CT-P13 trough levels, an infliximab biosimilar, in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. / Utilidad clínica de la determinación de niveles de CT-P13, biosimilar de infliximab, en el control de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.

INTRODUCTION: CT-P13 is a biosimilar drug of infliximab (IFX), effective in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The monitoring of levels of IFX and anti-IFX antibodies is now considered part of the integral management. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical response according to a strictly clinical (CLN) or proactive (PRO) approach based on the monitoring of levels in week 14, in clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in IBD patients starting CT-P13. In the PRO group, levels of IFX and post-induction antibodies were systematically measured (week 14) and those with infraterapeutic levels (<3µg/ml) were intensified, irrespective of the clinical response. RESULTS: We included 77 patients (23 ulcerative colitis and 54 Crohn's disease). Both PRO (n=41) and CLN (n=36) groups showed initial and long-term efficacy without significant differences. At week 14, 61% clinical remission (CR) (58.5% PRO, 63.9% CLN) and 80.5% at least partial response (PR) (80.5% PRO, 80.6% CLN). In week 54, 68.8% CR (61% PRO, 77.8% CLN) and 76.6% at least PR (73.2% PRO, 80.6% CLN). Of the patients in CR in week 14 (24 PRO, 23 CLN), 13 of the PRO group were intensified due to infra-therapeutic levels. In this subgroup no significant differences were observed in secondary loss of response (PRO 0%, CLN 8.7%). CONCLUSION: Proactive management does not improve response or remission rates in the first year. The intensification of clinical remission patients with post-induction infratherapeutic levels does not seem to significantly prevent secondary loss of response in the first year.

Afectación del aparato digestivo en la covid-19. Una revisión sobre el tema / Involvement of the digestive system in covid-19. A review

La pandemia por el SARS-CoV-2 está conllevando una elevada mortalidad y suponiendo una crisis sanitaria a nivel mundial. La afectación fundamental es respiratoria; sin embargo, el virus también puede afectar a otros órganos, como el tracto gastrointestinal y el hígado. Los síntomas más habituales son anorexia y diarrea. Aproximadamente, en la mitad de los casos se podría detectar ARN viral en heces, lo que constituye otra línea de transmisión y diagnóstico. La covid-19 tiene peor pronóstico en pacientes con comorbilidades, aunque no existe evidencia suficiente en caso de enfermedades digestivas previas. Las endoscopias digestivas pueden originar aerosoles, lo que las convierte en técnicas con elevado riesgo de infección. Expertos y organizaciones científicas a nivel mundial han elaborado guías de funcionamiento para adoptar medidas de prevención. Se revisan las evidencias disponibles sobre la afectación gastrointestinal y hepática, la repercusión en pacientes con enfermedades digestivas previas y las guías de funcionamiento para las unidades de endoscopia durante la pandemia

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is leading to high mortality and a global health crisis. The primary involvement is respiratory; however, the virus can also affect other organs, such as the gastrointestinal tract and liver. The most common symptoms are anorexia and diarrhea. In about half of the cases, viral RNA could be detected in the stool, which is another line of transmission and diagnosis. covid19 has a worse prognosis in patients with comorbidities, although there is not enough evidence in case of previous digestive diseases. Digestive endoscopies may give rise to aerosols, which make them techniques with a high risk of infection. Experts and scientific organizations worldwide have developed guidelines for preventive measures. The available evidence on gastrointestinal and hepatic involvement, the impact on patients with previous digestive diseases and operating guidelines for Endoscopy Units during the pandemic are reviewed

Hemorragia digestiva alta secundaria a sobreingesta de inhibidores selectivos de la recaptación de serotonina y antiinflamatorios no esteroideos / Upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to overdose of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

No disponible

Síndrome de Zieve, una entidad infradiagnosticada / Zieve's syndrome, an underdiagnosed entity

No disponible